

Sass – Syntactically Awesome Style Sheets Moving forward in the article, we will take a look at the 3 most popular CSS Preprocessors currently being used by developers around the world i.e Sass, LESS, and Stylus.īefore you decide the winner between Sass vs LESS vs Stylus, let us get to know them in detail first. While different Preprocessors have their own unique syntaxes, eventually all of them are compiled to the same native CSS code. Therefore, the complex and advanced Preprocessor syntax needs to be first compiled into native CSS syntax which can then be interpreted by the browsers to avoid cross browser compatibility issues.
PREPROS CHANGE FILE PATH FROM SCSS TO CSS CODE
However, browsers can only understand native vanilla CSS code and will be unable to interpret the CSS Preprocessor syntax. By using CSS Preprocessors, you can seamlessly automate menial tasks, build reusable code snippets, avoid code repetition and bloating and write nested code blocks that are well organized and easy to read. It helps us to use complex logical syntax like – variables, functions, mixins, code nesting, and inheritance to name a few, supercharging your vanilla CSS. This is where CSS Preprocessors come to the rescue.Ī CSS Preprocessor is a tool used to extend the basic functionality of default vanilla CSS through its own scripting language. As a result, a developer is bound by limitations and would face extreme difficulty in code maintenance and scalability, especially when working on large projects involving extensive code and multiple CSS stylesheets. What Is A CSS Preprocessor?ĬSS in itself is devoid of complex logic and functionality which is required to write reusable and organized code.
PREPROS CHANGE FILE PATH FROM SCSS TO CSS HOW TO
In this article, we will explore what CSS Preprocessors are, what are their advantages, their features, comparing the most popular types of CSS Preprocessors being used and finally how to set them up in your project. Yet quite a lot of beginners and even some experienced developers, are doing a great disservice to themselves by being reluctant to adopt CSS Preprocessors and continue to ignore them. It would be unfathomable to go back to the days without Sass, stuck in the messy quagmire of vanilla CSS code which often proved difficult to manage and organize as you scale up. To all the front-end developers actively arguing around the debate for Sass vs LESS in their projects, I can only hope that your neck isn’t sore from nodding in agreement. To say that its impact in pushing the limits of what CSS can achieve has been nothing short of revolutionary, would be a grave understatement. It has been a while since the concept of CSS Preprocessor made its debut into the mainstay of front-end web development workflow and changed the way we code CSS.
